The historical record makes this clear. Economic forecasts routinely fail to anticipate recessions, political predictions collapse at moments of realignment, and technological change arrives earlier, later, or in forms few expected.
To understand the future, you can’t make prophecies—you have to understand the past. That’s because the future isn’t predicted, it is rehearsed.
The limits of prediction
What has sustained our collective faith in prediction was not its accuracy, but the environment in which it operated. In the past, errors unfolded slowly, and institutions had time to respond and adjust. When forecasts failed, the consequences were often contained and reversible, which allowed prediction to persist as a useful illusion rather than a dependable guide.
What has changed is not our ability to see the future clearly, but our ability to absorb being wrong. The margin for error that once existed across institutions, economies, and societies has narrowed significantly. Pressures that once arrived sequentially now arrive simultaneously, interacting and reinforcing one another in ways that are difficult to isolate or manage independently.
Read the full article here
